The Complete Guide to SOAP Notes: Format, Templates, Examples, and Best Practices

A complete guide to SOAP note format, documentation errors that affect billing, and how AI scribes are changing the workflow for independent and group practices.

Medically Reviewed by Donald Lazure

Written by the Commure Scribe Team

Published: May 6, 2026

9 min read

Download our free SOAP Note template

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Medical scribe app interface showing a recording waveform, a list of patient notes, and a SOAP note for John Doe.

Try the #1 AI Scribe.

99.4% accuracy. 43-second charts. $59/month.

Try Commure Scribe for Free

What You Need to Know About SOAP Notes

  • SOAP notes organize every patient encounter into four sections: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. Mixing up what belongs where is the most common source of vague, underbillable notes.
  • The format has been standard since the 1960s and is used across virtually every outpatient specialty.
  • Ambient AI tools now draft a structured SOAP note seconds after the visit ends. The clinician always reviews before signing.

↓ Jump to the free downloadable template

soap note template

What is a SOAP note?

A SOAP note organizes a patient encounter into four sections: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. Each section has a specific job. The format covers initial evaluations and ongoing progress notes across virtually every outpatient specialty.

SOAP notes were introduced in the 1960s by Dr. Lawrence Weed at the University of Vermont. His goal was to replace free-text documentation with a consistent format any provider could read and act on. More than six decades later, it remains the standard in most US outpatient settings.

The format serves several clinical and administrative functions at once:

  • Supports continuity of care when multiple providers see the same patient
  • Provides the basis for billing and reimbursement
  • Creates a legal record of the encounter
  • Helps clinicians organize clinical thinking at the point of care

SOAP is the primary documentation format in most outpatient medical specialties. Counseling and inpatient teams often use DAP, BIRP, APSO, or SBAR instead. Those alternatives are covered in a dedicated comparison section below.

What does each section of a SOAP note contain?

A SOAP note has four sections, each with a distinct job: Subjective for patient-reported information, Objective for clinician measurements, Assessment for clinical interpretation, and Plan for actions taken. Mixing up what belongs where is the most common source of documentation errors. Most billing and compliance problems trace back to wrong-section placement or vague language.

In the Subjective section, document the chief complaint and history of present illness in the patient's own words. Include onset, duration, quality, and severity of symptoms; aggravating and alleviating factors; relevant context and associated symptoms; past medical history, family history, and social history; and current medications as reported by the patient.

Common errors in S: Using a clinical label instead of the patient's report — writing "patient reports dyspnea" instead of "patient reports shortness of breath." Interpreting symptoms rather than recording them. Leaving the chief complaint vague when the patient used specific words.

In the Objective section, record everything observed and measured. Everything in O must be independently verifiable. Include vital signs, physical exam findings, lab values, imaging results, range of motion measurements, wound dimensions, neurological findings, and mental status exam findings when directly observed.

Common errors in O: Using global summaries instead of measurements, writing "ROM exercises performed" without the measured range. Including clinical interpretations that belong in A. Omitting normal findings, which matters for billing and legal review.

In the Assessment section, state your clinical interpretation of the S and O data. For a simple visit, this is a working or confirmed diagnosis. For a complex visit, list each problem in order of priority. A common error is restating the chief complaint instead of stating clinical judgment.

The Assessment is the most consequential section for billing. ICD-10 codes on a claim must be supported by what is written in A. Vague assessments like "patient doing better" or "symptoms improving" create denial risk.

In the Plan section, document every action taken or recommended, organized by problem. Include medications with drug, dose, route, frequency, and duration; referrals, labs, and imaging ordered; patient education provided; and follow-up timing.

The plan should be specific enough that a colleague could act on it without calling you. "Continue current management" is not a plan. "Continue metformin 1000mg BID, recheck HbA1c in 3 months, patient counseled on dietary changes, follow up in 3 months" is a plan.

Common errors in P: Vague entries that omit the specific action. Missing patient education. No follow-up timing, which is both a clinical and billing requirement.

What does a complete SOAP note look like in practice?

SOAP note examples differ across specialties because the clinical content differs. A primary care note manages multiple active problems, a psychiatry note centers on mental status and medication response, and a physical therapy note documents functional measurements and progress toward discharge. All three are shown below.

SOAP note example 1: Primary care, established patient follow-up

S: 45-year-old male presents for type 2 diabetes follow-up. Reports good medication adherence. No hypoglycemic episodes since last visit. Fatigue improved. No new complaints.

O: BP 128/82, HR 74, weight 194 lbs (down 3 lbs). FBG 118 per patient report. HbA1c 7.1% from last week.

A: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, improving glycemic control. Weight trending down. BP within goal range.

P: Continue metformin 1000mg BID. Reinforce dietary progress. Recheck HbA1c in 3 months. Patient counseled on weight management. Follow up in 3 months or sooner if symptoms change.

SOAP note example 2: Psychiatry, established patient medication management

S: 32-year-old female presents for MDD medication management. Reports mood "about a 6 out of 10." Sleep improved since sertraline increase 4 weeks ago. Appetite low. Denies SI/HI. No new stressors.

O: Alert and oriented x3. Affect appropriate, mildly constricted. Speech normal in rate and volume. Thought process is linear. No psychomotor changes. PHQ-9 score: 11 (moderate).

A: Major depressive disorder, moderate, partial response to sertraline 100mg. Sleep improving. Appetite and energy suboptimal.

P: Continue sertraline 100mg daily. Add mirtazapine 7.5mg QHS for appetite and sleep. Patient counseled on new medication and side effects. Return in 4 weeks or call if adverse effects. Repeat PHQ-9 at next visit.

SOAP note example 3: Physical therapy, initial evaluation

S: 58-year-old male referred for right shoulder pain after rotator cuff repair 8 weeks ago. Pain 5/10 at rest, 8/10 with overhead reach. Unable to lift arm above shoulder height. Home exercises done inconsistently due to pain.

O: ROM right shoulder: flexion 85°, abduction 70°, external rotation 30°. Strength: 3/5 flexion, 3/5 abduction. Incision healed. No swelling or erythema. Mild forward head posture, elevated right shoulder girdle.

A: Right shoulder post rotator cuff repair, 8 weeks post-op. ROM and strength deficits consistent with surgical timeline. Forward head posture contributing to impingement pattern.

P: Begin PT: PROM progressing to AROM, scapular stabilization, rotator cuff strengthening. HEP reviewed and corrected. Patient educated on posture and load management. Goal: 120° flexion and 4/5 strength in 6 weeks. Next visit in 3 days.

What are the most common SOAP note mistakes? Which ones affect billing?

Most SOAP note errors fall into three categories: wrong-section placement, vague language, and copy-forward habits. Wrong-section errors undermine note credibility. Vague language creates billing exposure. Copy-forward notes generate audit risk and continuity failures.

Placing clinical interpretations in the wrong section is the most common structural error. Documenting a diagnosis in S ("patient is diabetic") instead of the patient's report ("patient reports managing diabetes with metformin") conflates clinical knowledge with what the patient said. Documenting exam findings in A instead of O skips the measurement that makes a finding verifiable and billable.

Vague language in Assessment and Plan creates the most billing and compliance risk. Physicians in the top decile of note length spend 39% more time in the EHR after hours.¹ A short, specific note is more defensible than a long, vague one.

ICD-10 codes must be supported by what is written in A. If the assessment reads "knee pain" but the claim is coded for osteoarthritis, a payer audit will flag it. A plan that omits patient education, follow-up timing, or clinical reasoning will not support higher-complexity E&M codes.

Copy-forward notes are a compliance risk most practices underestimate. Carrying a previous note forward without updating the objective findings creates a record that does not reflect the visit. It creates audit exposure and continuity risk for any provider reading the chart later.

Omitting safety documentation is a specific risk in behavioral health. For psychiatry and mental health notes, documenting whether SI and HI were assessed and the result is both a clinical standard and a legal protection. A note that omits this is incomplete regardless of how thorough the rest is.

What SOAP note template works best for your practice size?

The template you use beats the perfect template you abandon mid-visit. Over-engineered templates get worked around rather than followed. The right template captures what matters for your most common visit types and fits the specialty you practice.

For an independent practice, a focused template works best. Use a few structured fields per section, a ROS targeted to the chief complaint rather than exhaustive, and a plan section with space for two to three problem entries. A solo family medicine physician has different needs than a solo psychiatrist. The template should reflect the specialty, not a generic format.

For a small group practice, the template serves a second purpose: standardization. When all clinicians document the same visit type the same way, the practice can audit note quality consistently, support cross-coverage without providers decoding each other's style, and onboard new hires faster. Clinicians who build their own systems create a practice-level risk that compounds over time.

For a medium group practice, template management becomes a system problem. At this scale, EHR-native templates with admin controls are standard. The conversation shifts from "what should the template include" to "how do we ensure consistent use."

Specialty-specific templates matter more than most practices admit. A psychiatry SOAP template built on a primary care format forces mental health clinicians to adapt it constantly. Templates for behavioral health, physical therapy, and primary care should be built from the ground up for each discipline.

How does SOAP compare to DAP, BIRP, and other documentation formats?

SOAP is the most widely used outpatient documentation format, but it is not the right choice for every specialty or encounter type. Primary care and physical therapy typically use SOAP. Behavioral health counseling commonly uses DAP or BIRP, and inpatient handoffs often use APSO or SBAR.

DAP (Data, Assessment, Plan) merges S and O into a single Data section. This makes the note shorter and removes the decision about which section a finding belongs in. DAP is common in behavioral health and counseling. The tradeoff: a reader cannot always tell what the patient reported versus what the clinician observed, which matters for billing.

BIRP (Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan) is widely used in counseling and mental health therapy. The four sections cover what the patient did or said, what the clinician did in response, how the patient responded, and next steps. BIRP does not suit medical encounters that involve physical examination. For psychotherapy, it is a better fit than SOAP.

APSO (Assessment, Plan, Subjective, Objective) leads with the clinician's conclusion. A provider reading during a handoff sees the assessment and plan first. It is less common in outpatient settings.

SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) is for provider-to-provider communication, not documenting encounters. It is standard for nursing-to-physician handoffs in hospitals.

FormatBest forS/O distinctionSpeedSOAPOutpatient medical, primary care, PT, psychiatryExplicitModerateDAPBehavioral health, counselingCombinedFasterBIRPPsychotherapy, mental health therapyNot applicableModerateAPSOInpatient, emergency handoffsExplicit (reversed)Faster for readersSBARProvider-to-provider communicationNot applicableFast

The comparison above is based on standard clinical documentation practice and publicly available professional guidance. It is a directional framework, not a substitute for specialty-specific guidance from your professional association.

How does AI change the SOAP note workflow for outpatient practices?

With an ambient AI scribe, the clinician records the encounter rather than typing during or after it. Within seconds of clicking End Recording, a structured SOAP note appears: Subjective from what the patient reported, Objective from exam findings discussed aloud, Assessment with working diagnoses, and Plan with action items. The clinician then reviews, edits, and signs before the note enters the chart.

The most consistent finding across studies is the patient presence benefit. A study of 22 physicians found that 68% of patient-engagement comments were positive, with clinicians describing more eye contact and greater ability to stay present rather than focused on a screen.² For psychiatry in particular, where attention to the patient is the therapeutic instrument, this shift matters.

The evidence on time savings is real but modest. The only published randomized controlled trial of LLM-powered AI scribes covered 238 physicians across 14 specialties at UCLA Health. It found a 41-second reduction in per-note time for one tool. The other tool did not reach statistical significance.³

A multicenter study of 263 clinicians across six health systems found burnout dropped from 51.9% to 38.8% after 30 days.⁴ A Penn Medicine study of 46 clinicians found 20.4% less time in notes and 30% less after-hours documentation work.⁷ A study of 8,581 clinicians across 5 health centers found AI scribe adoption cut documentation time by 16 minutes per 8-hour day.⁸

AI-generated notes are consistently longer, not shorter. The Penn Medicine study found a 20.6% increase in note length even as clinician time fell.⁷ Note length is not a proxy for note quality.

Commure Scribe captures the session and generates a structured SOAP note within seconds of the visit ending. It works across 90+ languages with automatic detection, integrates with 60+ EHRs, and is used by 75,000+ clinicians. Clinicians report closing charts in an average of 43 seconds. The clinician always reviews and edits before signing.

How do you evaluate an AI-generated SOAP note before signing?

The review step is where errors get caught before they enter the permanent record. A 2025 review in npj Digital Medicine found that modern AI scribes have an error rate of about 1–3%, with errors including hallucinations, critical omissions, and contextual misreadings.⁶ Patient consent for recording should be documented before the first visit is recorded.

Use this checklist for each AI-generated note before signing:

  • Consent: Is patient consent for recording documented per your state's requirements?
  • S section: Does it reflect what the patient reported, in their own words? Is the chief complaint specific?
  • O section: Are vital signs and exam findings accurate? Do any values need confirming against the EHR source?
  • A section: Does the assessment support the ICD-10 codes being billed? Are all active problems addressed?
  • P section: Is every action listed: prescriptions, referrals, labs, patient education, follow-up timing?
  • Overall: Would a colleague covering this patient have what they need from this note?

For a new AI scribe workflow, plan for an adjustment period. Record the first visit, review the output, and note what the system captured well and what needed editing. Most clinicians report the workflow becomes efficient within the first week.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are SOAP notes used for?

SOAP notes document a clinical encounter in a structured format that supports continuity of care, billing, legal defensibility, and communication between providers. They are the standard in most US outpatient settings.

How long should a SOAP note be for a 15-minute visit?

Specificity matters more than length. A note for a straightforward visit should cover the chief complaint clearly, record objective findings accurately, state a specific assessment, and list every plan item. That is more defensible than a long note padded with boilerplate or copied from a previous visit.

How do you write a SOAP note step by step?

Start with S: document the chief complaint and history in the patient's own words. Move to O: record vitals, exam findings, and test results. Write A: state your clinical assessment, listing problems by priority. Finish with P: document every action with enough detail that a colleague could act on it without calling you. Review before signing.

Can AI generate SOAP notes automatically, or does the clinician still need to write them?

Ambient AI tools draft a structured SOAP note from the recorded visit. The workflow is Capture, Edit, Finalize: the AI produces a complete draft, and the clinician reviews and signs before the note is final.

What should the Assessment and Plan sections include?

The Assessment should state clinical judgment: a working or confirmed diagnosis, or a problem list. Not a restatement of the chief complaint. The Plan should list every action by problem: medications with dose and frequency, referrals, orders, patient education, and follow-up timing.

SOAP Note Template Download

Download a copy of this template

Thanks! Your template is ready.

Click below to download

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Sources

  1. Apathy NC, Rotenstein L, Bates DW, Holmgren AJ. Documentation dynamics: Note composition, burden, and physician efficiency. Health Serv Res. 2023;58(3):674-685. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14097
  2. Jen Van Tiem et al. Listening to the note: clinician perspectives on ambient artificial intelligence scribes in medical documentation. JAMIA. 2026;33(2):255-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf214
  3. Lukac PJ et al. Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Trial. NEJM AI. 2025;2(12). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12768499/
  4. Olson KD et al. Use of Ambient AI Scribes to Reduce Administrative Burden and Professional Burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(10):e2534976. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12492056/
  5. Topaz M et al. Beyond human ears: navigating the uncharted risks of AI scribes in clinical practice. npj Digit. Med. 2025;8:569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01895-6
  6. Duggan MJ et al. Clinician Experiences With Ambient Scribe Technology to Assist With Documentation Burden and Efficiency. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(2):e2460637. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2830383
  7. Rotenstein LS et al. Changes in Clinician Time Expenditure and Visit Quantity With Adoption of Artificial Intelligence–Powered Scribes. JAMA. 2026. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2847319

Discover the Latest from Commure